Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 09:52

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Stock futures drop on rising geopolitical risk as Israel-Iran attacks continue: Live updates - CNBC
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
How can couples reverse the buildup of resentment once they notice it?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Can I use Amazon Alexa Claude AI on my Echo device?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Jessie J breast cancer: singer undergoes surgery after diagnosis - BBC